CPA 5-25 TFL Panel Standard for Contract Casegoods Specs
Connect the proposed panel and finish to supporting documents, sample references and the furniture drawing.
A contract casegoods finish schedule needs more than a colour reference and the word “melamine.” If your company wants to specify the CPA 5-25 TFL Panel Standard, connect that reference to the exact panel, finish and component being offered. A standard reference is useful only when the supporting information describes the product you intend to buy.
This article offers procurement questions for FF&E project teams reviewing guestroom desks, bedside units, dressers and similar casegoods. The suggested review steps below are editorial recommendations for preparing a project specification, rather than a description of a prescribed certification programme or a claim about any particular product.
What the CPA 5-25 TFL Panel Standard covers
The Composite Panel Association publishes CPA 5-25, issued 1 May 2025, as a voluntary North American TFL panel standard. It covers interior decorative panels on particleboard, MDF or hardwood plywood; flooring is excluded. Its surface categories include lightfastness, scratching, staining, defects and wear, with three wear classes. Large-ball impact testing is optional. Some test methods modify ISO 4586-2:2018. Table 2 addresses dimensional properties; its flatness provision excludes panels faced on only one side. Sections 7–8 address identification and conformity assessment. Read the complete requirements in the official CPA standard.
For an Australian project, treat any proposal to use this North American reference as a specification decision for the project team to approve. Confirm the destination requirements separately. Keep surface evidence, core material evidence and finished-furniture acceptance in separate parts of the review.
Start with the casegoods component, then identify the panel
Begin with the drawing item and the surface that needs approval. Instead of attaching one general finish sheet to a guestroom package, identify the desk top, drawer front, exposed side, internal shelf and reverse face separately wherever your specification makes a distinction. The aim is to make it possible to answer a direct question: which proposed panel does this document describe?
For example, a hypothetical schedule could assign a finish reference to a desk top and another reference to its vertical side panel. That does not imply the two surfaces need different performance. It gives your team somewhere to record whether they are intended to be identical, and somewhere to document an approved difference.
Ask for a proposed panel description that includes the decorative reference, substrate description, nominal thickness, faced sides, surface texture and gloss description. Record the document revision alongside it. If the supplier offers an alternative, retain the original requested description and add the proposed alternative in a separate column. Avoid replacing the requested material name before the substitution has been reviewed.
Use the guestroom casegoods specification page to organise the furniture item information. The panel review belongs within that item record, so a finish selection can be traced back to the relevant piece of furniture.
Build a surface evidence table around the named reference
For this review, we suggest an evidence table with a row for each performance question your project team has chosen to ask. Give each row a place for the requirement, offered product reference, supporting document, reported result, reviewer comment and unresolved question. Keep the project's acceptance decision visible rather than burying it in correspondence.
Do not prefill a “pass” column simply because a brochure lists the standard. Ask what the claim covers and which evidence supports it. If the document states an overall conformity claim, request enough information to understand that claim. If it presents selected test results, record them as selected results until the scope has been clarified.
When a result is absent, write “not supplied” or “clarification requested.” A blank cell leaves the next reviewer unsure whether the document was missing, the question was irrelevant or someone had already accepted the omission. Name the person responsible for resolving the question and link the resolution to the same item reference.
Use plain status descriptions such as “received,” “under review” and “accepted for this item.” These are suggested document statuses, not performance grades. Their purpose is to prevent a received report from being mistaken for an approved specification.
Read the method and result together
Ask the reviewer to record the method reference beside the result being considered. If a document gives only a number or a marketing description, request the information needed to understand it. A useful clarification question is: “Which method, edition and stated modifications were used for this result, and which offered panel does the result represent?”
Keep the supplier's wording intact in your evidence record. Add your team's interpretation in a different field. This makes it possible to distinguish the reported result from the purchasing decision without rewriting the report or presenting an interpretation as a laboratory finding.
Where two offers use different methods or different result descriptions, flag the comparison for technical review. Do not create an equivalence by renaming the columns. Your reviewer can decide whether further evidence is required or whether the proposed information is sufficient for the specific item.
For instance, a hypothetical offer might provide a scratch result for a named decorative finish but leave the offered desk top finish unclear. The first follow-up should identify the connection between the evidence and the offer. Asking for a higher result before resolving product identity would leave the same documentary gap in place.
Send your casegoods drawings and BOQ
Send us your drawings and bill of quantities (BOQ). Our team will review it and get back to you.
Decide what evidence the horizontal and vertical faces need
Write down the project team's intended use for each component before asking for additional testing. A desk top, an internal shelf and an exposed drawer front are different drawing locations. Let the specification record explain what the team wants to verify at each location, without assuming that a product name alone settles the choice.
If your team requests impact information, make that request explicit and ask the supplier to identify the evidence offered. If it does not request that information, record the decision rather than leaving another person to infer it. The same approach can be used for appearance expectations and any supplementary project requirement.
Avoid converting a panel result into an unconditional statement about the whole furniture item. Keep separate review lines for the proposed surface, edge detail, fixing detail and furniture construction. A project can accept one part of a submittal while another part remains open; the record should make that distinction easy to see.
Bring these questions into the same discussion as the contract materials and finishes schedule. That allows the finish reference to stay connected to the rest of the furniture specification instead of becoming an isolated sample approval.
Resolve panel dimensions and the finished component drawing separately
Give the reviewer separate spaces for panel information and finished-component dimensions. Ask which document defines the supplied panel, which drawing defines the furniture part and which revision is proposed for manufacture. This article does not provide project tolerances; have the responsible project team set and approve them.
Where a specification calls up a standard tolerance, record the precise provision being invoked. Where the project requires an additional limit, label it as a project requirement. If the supplier proposes a different value or qualification, show that proposal beside the original request and ask for a decision.
For a faced panel, ask the supplier to describe the proposed construction on both sides. Do not let a drawing that shows only the visible finish leave the reverse face undefined. If a later proposal changes the construction, return that change to the technical reviewer rather than carrying forward an earlier acceptance automatically.
Check the interface with the furniture drawings at the same time: requested part thickness, edge treatment, visible face orientation, hardware positions and any adjoining component reference. These are suggested coordination questions. Their inclusion does not establish an engineering approval or a performance claim for the finished item.
Approve appearance with a referenced sample
Keep visual selection and performance-document review as separate decisions in the same item record. A team member approving the appearance should be able to identify the sample, finish reference and revision. A person reviewing documents should be able to see whether those documents describe that same proposed product.
For the appearance record, we suggest noting the face being approved, grain or pattern direction, texture reference, edge relationship and any agreed distinction between adjacent pieces. If comments are made on a photograph, retain the photograph with the relevant item reference and state whether the comment concerns appearance only.
Ask your team to identify the approved physical reference and who holds it. Where a supplier submits a revised sample, preserve the earlier comments and clearly mark the replacement. Avoid a series of unlabelled images in which the latest message becomes the only indication of what was accepted.
The samples, finishes and approvals page provides a place to connect these references to the furniture approval discussion. Do not use an appearance approval as shorthand for accepting every technical statement in the submission.
Review substitutions against the same questions
If a different panel or finish is proposed, ask for a short comparison that retains the original requested product description. Identify exactly what changes: decorative reference, construction, thickness, faced sides, supporting evidence or another specified attribute. A statement that the alternative is “similar” leaves the review question unanswered.
Review the changed fields and their consequences for the rest of the furniture package. If the appearance changes, return the sample selection to the relevant reviewer. If the evidence changes, reopen the corresponding document review. If the furniture drawing changes, identify the drawing revision that needs acceptance.
Do not copy an earlier acceptance onto the alternative simply to keep the file moving. Write a new decision linked to the proposed substitution, including any limits on that decision. For a project with repeated room types, identify which items and rooms the decision covers so that a local change does not silently become a package-wide change.
This suggested approach also gives your team a clear way to decline an alternative: state which requirement remains unresolved and what information would allow the proposal to be reconsidered. It avoids inventing a product ranking or treating a missing document as proof that a material has failed.
Prepare a focused casegoods enquiry
Send the furniture drawings, item schedule and finish references together. Identify which items call up CPA 5-25, what the project team wants verified and which technical decisions are still open. If your team has not yet selected a performance requirement, state the question to be reviewed instead of inserting an unsupported number.
For a North American project, include the project destination and the specification reference being used. For an Australian project considering the same reference, identify who will approve its use within the project specification. This keeps the enquiry tied to the project's actual requirements.
Our main markets are North America and Australia. Send us your drawings and bill of quantities (BOQ). Our team will review it and get back to you.
Frequently asked questions
What is a TFL panel?
TFL uses heat and pressure to fuse resin-impregnated decorative paper directly to a board substrate. See the definition in CPA 5-25, section 4.10. For a casegoods enquiry, identify the proposed panel, decorative reference and component drawing together.
What is the difference between MDF and TFL?
In CPA 5-25, MDF is a possible substrate; TFL describes the fused decorative surfacing. Ask for both the substrate description and surface specification. Keep their supporting documents separately identified in the review record.
Can one approval cover the whole guestroom package?
Define its scope before using it that way. List the furniture items, surfaces, finish references and revisions included in the decision. If an item or proposed panel falls outside that scope, request a separate review or a documented extension of the approval.
How should we handle a proposed alternative finish?
Retain the original request and identify the changed attributes in the alternative. Reopen the affected appearance, document and drawing reviews. Record a decision for that alternative rather than assuming that acceptance of the original proposal also accepts the replacement.
What if our team has not set the required surface performance?
State the intended furniture use and the open technical questions in the enquiry. Ask the responsible project reviewer to define the acceptance requirements. Leave unconfirmed values open; do not fill the specification with numbers taken from an unrelated product document.
What should we send with the enquiry?
Send the relevant furniture drawings, item quantities, finish references, project destination and any specification already issued. Identify the items being reviewed and the questions still awaiting a decision. Use the contact link above to send the project information for review.
Send your casegoods drawings and BOQ
Send us your drawings and bill of quantities (BOQ). Our team will review it and get back to you.